Scientists Admit to Doctoring Results to Prove Evolution

It has long been held by thez0rk and I that scientists don't really know what skeletons of extinct animals looked like. Most times when fossils are found, that are supposedly millions of years old, they are scattered all over the place. Scientists usually don't even find all of the bones to make a complete skeleton. So how can someone determine what an animal that no one saw looked like? Sounds unlikely, doesn't it? Like trying to build a lego model as it was intended without ever seeing a picture of what it's supposed to be, and without the directions. This is where a little creativity and a political agenda pull the curtain and go to work. Scientists just put the bones together in a shape that tries to make it appear as though evolution has happened. Occasionally we hear about how scientists have found a skeleton of someone from a few million years back. Then we see articles about how they've pieced it together and it looks like a cross between an ape and a human and say, 'Look, here's proof of evolution.' Don't believe the lie!